Wednesday, September 29, 2010

Ideas For Body Waxing Ads



People I pass the latest addition to the institutional crisis:
Today at 8 am interdepartmental representatives took the rectory. In the resolutions that they themselves did not appear even broadcast a demonstration at the rectory. Of course we all understand that if it is to take place hopefully not notice because that's how you manage, but it is necessary not to conceal information to all who accept these statements as a genuine communication channel. Already

not even question the representativeness. To make a revolution no one asks is how many, if not how many represent the objectives of the struggle.
What I wonder is whether this group of students is an organization that supports their actions. If you plan to negotiate mechanisms when non-violent teachers threatening to kill students on the Board want to go for what they are taking.
I wonder if they are sure thereby putting at risk the institutions of the university does not worsen the bargaining position, and finally asked me how and how they will respond to the thousands of students YES agree with the original fight, but NOT to lose that submitted. YES agree with the original fight, but NOT the authoritarian means that the group is conducting sectorized on behalf of all. YES agrees with the original fight, but that is NOT agree that a group would have closed the classroom door in the face.
is truly sad that a claim just part of the entire student community has been transformed into a clash between students. But we are forced to make decisions that when 25 people believed to represent a community of more than 10mil. Show a total disregard for their own students when they engage sockets and increase their claims in the manner of one who puts ever higher goals and never meet them.

Moreover, while developing the departmental assembly of Music on September 22 at its headquarters, at the headquarters of Venezuela's Theatre, these groups organized a meeting with 45 people. There making Venezuela voted by 25 votes to 20. Even after that dramatic
be decided by plebiscite
NOT TO TAKE. However, while this assembly ended, 200 students were present who had voted "no take" in the plebiscite, and blocked the shot.

The interdepartmental meeting last report (the Stones.) voted to add to request "residence halls" and resolved to "promote travel
the encounter of women and
borrow funds from the rector
." It is clear that the demand for building improvements are distorted, or otherwise becoming finally showing what it always meant for some sectors.
think objectively, we assert our departmental decisions, unless we take we do not want to take the rectory.
This all it does is create more obstacles to all efforts being made.

We asked to get some classrooms in the units that were not taken ... They called me today morning they were, but they know that? does not operate the rector can not effectuate. All who continue with these measures is even more damaging to students. We

a building, came Rocamora, if the Rector does not work, can start work, you can not sign the papers for the allocation / departments who move there. We
meetings with the SPU, they gave us 4 in the latter was offered a second rental and re-strengthen the possible purchase of another property. That buildings are going to occur if people rector infrastructure can not go to work? We must prevent it being effective in making this attempt. We must demonstrate, to the Rector us stand for this to end!.

NOT TO TAKE - IF A JOINT CLAIMS - ALTERNATIVE
WE RETURN TO BE STUDIED - RESPECT THE DEPARTMENTAL DECISIONS

Greetings and embrace all Director Francisco Martinez Cevasco Superior Multimedia Arts.

Posted by admin at 4:47 PM

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)